The 10’s are equally as good. As good now as it was then, and still the best bang for your dollar for 10×42 binoculars. Glass may not be the absolute equal of Swaro but I bet it's close. The Swarovski’s were great but did not beat the UHD’s. So a new set of lets say 12x is $1600~ And swaros are 1800-2k used, am i right? Another optics resolution chart, this time at 50 yards in the middle of the day, gave us different results. The Vortex Razor HD has 16-48x magnification, which means that you can adjust the zoom range between 16 and 48 millimeters. Is it worth spending the extra money for the Swarovski SLC binoculars over the Vortex Razors HD’s? I can get a vortex for $1200 brand new, been … The New Razor UHD 10×42’s come in with a street price of $1499. Which 12x50's, the Vortex UHD or the Swaro's? The points of comparison we have chosen are considered to be the main features that most consumers immediately look for when buying a spotting scope. I compared the 12×50 UHD’s head to head with 12×50 Razor HD’s along with 11×45 Maven B.2’s & Swarovki 10×42 SLC’s. 2020 Swarovski. I understand you haven't had a chance to really test them in every condition you'd like to just yet. Ultimately, I dont think there's $1300 of difference in the two scopes, but the ergonomics and handling of one over the other made a huge difference to me, to the point where I'll be selling my Vortex Razor shortly and keeping the Swaro. 12x binoculars are large and the new UHD’s are bigger than the 12x Razor HD’s because of the different prism used.

He chose the Razor HD.

Not sure about the spotter ... but I have Vortex Razor HD Binocs that are. Wondering if swaro would be worth the extra $1300. However, your overall field of view will decrease as you zoom in on your target. That being said the biggest difference TO ME is the range of the focus on both scopes. This range is best for those who wear eyeglasses while hunting. I'm using the 25-50x wide angle eyepiece in the Swaro so comparatively the FOV in the Vortex is slightly smaller across the range. Should be interesting. We believe that mentorship is conservation and strive to be a resource for anyone interested in hunting. The quality of the binoculars are amazing and by far my favorite binos I have ever used. I only played with the 18s for few seconds at there open house and eye relief seemed very good. So i have not gotten to low low light like ive been planning, work keeps getting in the way.

The 18's should be a good option for PRS spotting duty. Hunting is one hobby that requires patience and precision for you to hit your mark. I can get very consistent readings out to 1000 yards on steel targets and dirt berms regardless of weather. While I feel like there was a difference in my eyes between the 3 different binos on the resolution chart, if I were judging a buck in the early morning light I don’t know that I would be able to see such a difference. New Vortex Razor (22-48/65) vs Old (16-48/65)? I'd be curious to see if the glass on them makes them worth 2-3x the price of the Bushnells.

The, The primary difference between the existing. Especially when you take into consideration the customer service and warranty you get when buying Vortex. I have not had a chance to check out the UHDs yet as my bass pro doesn’t have them yet. Then you have to take a look at the Vortex Razor HD binos that have been around for years. I called them requesting AMG binos that would equal swaro last year. The 12’s are fantastic and the king is the 18.

UHD stands for Ultra High Definition. The Vortex of course is only $1199 which is close to half the price of the $2200 Swarovski.

The Razor UHD Binoculars bring a new level of optical quality to Vortex's bino lineup, putting them on par with popular European manufacturers like Swarovski, Leica, and Steiner! They DO interest me at a 1,000~ dollar range, Sold my viper hd’s and ordered a set of the 12x50’s from sportoptics with their 13% off deal. This site is a free online resource that strives to offer helpful content and comparison features to its visitors.

"Twilight Factor" is such a NEW concept to me! Again a few seconds of use.

Your email address will not be published. But I do have to say that these binos look gorgeous! The Vortex Razor HD also features dual focus wheels, which make it easy to focus on an object quickly at any range. UHD stands for Ultra High Definition. He’s pissed! Your Conquest HD is a nice, quality binocular with a track record of good performance. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc or its affiliates. The key upgrade for the Vortex Razor UHD is the new Abbe Koenig prism system. Even though glassing in good light was admittedly better with the new UHD Razors. Pretty close to the SLCs in optical clarity.

If you are interested in getting your hands on some Vortex Razor UHD’s, I highly recommend them. 59 | Energy, Connections & Positivity – with DeeAnn Servey, The Longest Two Minutes of Your Life | An Intro Into Waterfowl Hunting, Ep.

Tie. I have personally observed it myself many times with binoculars of various formats. www.wabackcountry.com, GEAR REVIEW: Vortex Razor HD 4000 Rangefinder, We asked this doe “where’s your boyfriend?”, If tomorrow all my things were gone, When we say premium, it means we are talking about spending more money on the product. Never looked through a vortex razor hd. For those who love the outdoors and hunting, having the right tools handy is essential. However, your overall field of view will decrease as you zoom in on your target. How do the two scopes compare? I felt i needed sunglasses with the uhd and not with the razor hd.

I'm looking to buy a new spotting scope. Required fields are marked *, Copyright © 2014-2020 S&S Archery Backcountry | Powered by WordPress | Design by Iceable Themes, In June of 2013 S&S owner Steve Speck wrote a review comparing the, Six years later we’re still happy to recommend the, New for 2019 the Vortex Razor UHD Binoculars are Vortex’s entry into the elite glass arena.

I would choose them over the SLC 15’s. In the meantime make sure to go and subscribe to the Washington Backcountry YouTube channel as well as follow us on Instagram @Washington_Backcountry. The exit pupil diameter is the small circle of light that goes into the front lens and goes out of the ocular lens. Wow! , Johnny’s expressions need no words! Strange that Vortex doesn't have much information on their site, but grabbed this off eurooptic, Vortex Optics just added four new models to their Razor HD line of binoculars!

2019 Some time ago, I was able to observe a Canon 18x56 stabilized and the resolution was fantastic although when pressing the magic button there was some kind of "artifact" in the image, let's call it "tremor" or something similar ... for astronomical observation also very good , the Moon fantastic!

After reading as much info as I could get my hands on, it seemed like there were so many opinions out there that I needed to do a comparative analysis myself to decide. I have the Zeiss Conquest HD 15x56 are incredible, but I want to buy the model 18x56 for having more power, but my doubt is the darkness for having so much increase. Anymore than 15X, might as well go APM and use interchangeable Eye pieces. I have to talk about the bino harness that comes with the new Razors.

The Swarovski has 20-60x magnification, making it suitable for those who love to hunt in massive spaces.

Happy Halloween! They are 7″ x 5.5″ and weigh 32.2oz. That following was built upon their “VIP” warranty. 35D1AC8B-737C-4394-AA78-62EF5AAB66C4.jpeg, CB2AB8FC-06D6-4B6B-995A-DE88202A215F.jpeg, 1C37AF2D-3D59-448F-BBE8-288FA61F5A03.jpeg, 58BB8180-8C32-4679-B19B-D652CA39BCDF.jpeg, 9C7C90D7-B8A9-48E9-9855-B8F8D5F303AF.jpeg, 5C8DAEE6-2ED4-41B7-826C-20119869B519.jpeg, B5B29E27-E471-431A-B0E8-75C0F242B510.jpeg. May His face shine upon you and give you peace. BF Supporter But I will be holding on to my Swarovski SLCs because I value the low light performance and smaller/lighter package. Thanks for reading this gear review. Here is what we saw: Most of our comparisons were done side by side with the Vortex Razor HD 10×42, the Vortex Razor UHD 10×42, and the Swarovski SLC 10×42. I like the Fury HD, but it is a bit lacking optically so this would be just the ticket. / Vortex Razor HD Spotting Scope vs Swarovski: Which One Is Best? Hopefully you will never have to test their warranty, but it is nice to know it is there.

Vortex Razor HD Spotting Scope vs Swarovski: Final Verdict, What Is a Spotting Scope Used For: Understanding Its Versatility, How to Choose a Spotting Scope for Target Shooting, How to Buy a Spotting Scope: Great Tips for Beginners, Best Spotting Scope for Birding of 2020: Top Five Picks, Best Spotting Scope for Target Shooting [2020 Reviewed], Best Budget Spotting Scope of 2020: Complete Reviews with Comparison, Best Spotting Scopes of 2020: Complete Reviews with Comparisons, Emarth 20-60x60AE Angled Spotting Scope Review. Thats $300 less than the SLC’s at $1799. Vortex Razor HD won in this category because of the higher distance it can provide to the user.

As long as I'm getting accurate numbers to 1000 yards I'm happy. I first saw this with the Viper HD’s and while it was nice to have them included, honestly I was not super impressed. That says a lot.

If you have plans to upgrade your game, you also need to invest in a premium spotting scope optics. For reference, my sole purpose for these binoculars is hunting out w… This eye relief distance provides more comfort, especially for eyeglass wearers. 2018

I’m really curious to hear how you like them. Physically, the Swaro is around 250g lighter - doesnt sound much but when you handle both, its quite apparent.

I think its simply a much better scope FOR ME. The Vortex Razor HD has 16-48x magnification, which means that you can adjust the zoom range between 16 and 48 millimeters.

Readings out to 800 yards a few weekends ago were compared to readings from a terrapin and they were within a yard or two.